I’ve been taking a poke or few at SUGSA on twitter in the last few weeks around the2013 South African Scrum Gathering. It’s time to put it into perspective. My proposal to present a session at the conference been accepted and I have declined this acceptance.
This is not news to the SUGSA committee. I have communicated my
decision and my reasons to the SUGSA committee. I have also had
one-on-one discussions with a few committee members. I am satisfied
that the committee has received and digested my reasons. Individuals on
the committee have assured me that my feedback is in line with their
values and that they aim to address it in the future.
My poking is just me pressuring SUGSA to recognize a few issues which I believe are important to our community, and to force the committee to address us on their position. Tell all of us, not just me, of your position and we shall listen. That is all, no more, no less.
These are the issues that I raised with SUGSA.
- African conferences need to be representative of our community. One way is to nominate an African keynote. It will take a courageous decision but it can still happen. Agile Africa responded symbolically very late and it was fantastic.
- We must embrace our diversity and find ways of breaking the polarised community that exists in Cape Town. I think the people from Cape Town that attended Agile Africa in Johannesburg were surprised by the diversity of speakers and audience at that conference.
- Be transparent with the review process. The committee needs to maintain its independence and having committee members occupying several speaking slots sends the wrong message. I’ve seen that in other communities where the committee became the soapbox for individuals. If I was on the committee, I would withdraw my proposal on principal. I know of one committee member that did this. Thank you for taking a courageous step.
- I also questioned the expertise within the committee, especially for technical submissions. That is my perception and there is every chance that I might be wrong. I welcome the correction.
This is not a boycott. I will still attend as a paying conference attendee. I appreciate the
learning I receive from this community and look forward to more of the
I believe my issues have been heard and my actions, seemingly harsh to some, was necessary. I still want SUGSA to take a position publicly and I leave it them to figure out when and how. The SUGSA committee have invited me to discuss this further and I look forward to that.
Thanks go out to Austin Fagan, Sam Laing and Karen Greaves who gave me perspective to resolve a few internal conflicts, and shape my thoughts on why I am doing this, and what I expect out of it. Had they not given input, this could have been unnecessarily ugly.